I just found out that I have low triglycerides. Is this a problem? - low triglycerides
My triglyceride level is 59th The chart says more than 64 years is normal. But my LDL is slightly elevated at 106 and my total of 182 is not spectacular. My HDL is 64 Is there a document at home with a professional opinion?
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Low Triglycerides I Just Found Out That I Have Low Triglycerides. Is This A Problem?
3 comments:
Congratulations, you'll live forever! Seriously, this is a low risk of cholesterol associated with cardiovascular disease. Remember that the definition of "normal" for laboratory tests demonstrate that "the range of 95% of healthy people down". Although * is * possible to lower triglycerides for reasons of pathology have (malnutrition, * very * diet that) low fat, or malabsorption, where it is likely that you have chosen well your parents and a low risk of heart disease (or ) is on medication for cholesterol. In fact, LDL of 106 is not a "low" - is much lower than the average American does not, which is around 135th What is confusing is that the purpose of therapy if you have diabetes or heart disease is less than 100 (less than 70 option), but this only applies if you are a high risk for beginners. So, yes, your LDL is higher than that of a Neolithic hunter-gatherers who eat only nuts and berries, but a citizen of a modern society, which is pretty good. However, if* Not * you have heart disease, peripheral arterial disease, diabetes or family history terribly bad for cardiovascular disease, may want to adjust your medication to reduce LDL a little more.
It is a healthy lipid profile. Very good!
People with low triglycerides are safer from heart disease than others, even if the HDL is low and is your LDL. My 44 (is-thank God) Would jumped up, if I were you.
Post a Comment